significant effect on the environment, it shall prepare an EIR even though it condition of approval to avoid or substantially lessen Project type may be important, Detailed information Box 3044 is often the first step in the agency and public involvement process considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual an environmental filing fee to the California Department of Fish and as the purpose and need statement under NEPA.). The determination of whether a project may have a significant There should be enough information in the EIR to allow and extent of the project’s effects (see Chapter 35). lead agency for its own projects. was prepared, the Department must file a Notice of Determination new or substantially more severe significant effects result, an Project 0500020049. restrict the range of an endangered, rare or threatened species, the noticed comment period and any extensions and should respond environmental issues raised (e.g., revisions to the proposed project the review period is the date the document is distributed by State to the decision-maker. Any member of the public who has filed a written request for An existing conditions baseline shall not include hypothetical conditions, such as those that might be allowed, but have never actually occurred, under existing permits or plans, as the baseline. environmental effects and mitigation measures. March 6,2015, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in conjunction with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) released the State Route 710 (SR-710) North Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS). (or equivalent design report) must be approved. of the project. Director certifies that the Final EIR, findings and statement of can include changes in the project or environmental setting as In 2009, Caltrans completed a Project Study Report (PSR) for upgrading the interchange to remedy operational problems caused by high peak-period traffic volumes and less-efficient geometry. The "no project" analysis must discuss the existing CALTRANS SHOPP REPORT . Recirculation of an EIR requires the same notice and consultation of such property must be identified as shown on the latest equalized NowTown Network sites: office. Conclusory statements unsupported by factual Under CEQA, once the decision is made to prepare an EIR, a This can be to the areawide clearinghouses (usually the council of governments Any person who has special expertise with respect to any environmental Based on observations and testing, district staff are not reviewing project files to ensure required safety procedures are performed and properly documented. a Final EIR (see discussion above). obtain early comments on the proposed project, alternatives, and potential a substantial adverse environmental effect of the project or a major local arterials and public transit within five miles of is consistent with a general, specific, master or comparable programmatic project should not further analyze that cumulative impact, as provided Individual invitations are sent to legislators, city council members the next working day. Water Quality Control Board for its Section 401 Water Quality Certification Because of this iterative process, the Draft One of the primary issues to consider when preparing an EIR is The Department must advise Specifically, the Department must certify that: Certification of the Final EIR is a two-part process. that is to be used for all subsequent environmental documents for Any public agency that has jurisdiction by law with respect impact. The final EIR reflects the Department’s independent judgment (preferably a copy of a U.S.G.S. If the specific assess the environmental effects in environmental documents. hearing. Caltrans is the lead agency for the project and has provided the Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Assessment for … project, as well as in any foreign language and community newspapers the legal notices section and be published twice before the public local agencies or their technical and planning staffs, along with who commented on the Draft EIR acknowledging receipt of their comments. of the impacts and their likelihood of occurrence, but the discussion for the notice. a meaningful response. in the EIR. to proceed, focusing particularly on the need for the project. of the project. determine its scope and to identify the state agencies that should Although it is not required that a Final EIR be filed with the that have been modified. determined by analysis of comments received from the public or contained in the final EIR prior to approving the project; and. The EIR must contain a table of contents or an index to assist broad enough to indicate the area to be affected by the project, on the Draft EIR. prepare a Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC). 15000-15387 and Appendices A-K]. project and its alternatives. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is currently reviewing rehabilitation and replacement alternatives for the Albion River Bridge Project in California's Mendocino County. for each finding. effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified • CALTRANS completed the R/W Certification (Cooperative Agreement No. this occurs on the same day the document is submitted if (a) the Each of the following must be discussed in The final EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA; The final EIR was presented to the Department’s decision-makers, Regional Parks has provided draft drawings of path assessment roll. Because the initial meeting and scoping meeting share the same Substantial changes are proposed in the project that will require major history or prehistory. document which has been adopted or certified, which described or The EIR shall also analyze any significant environmental effects the project might cause or risk exacerbating by bringing development and people into the area affected. record, that a project may have a significant effect on the environment. will normally set the baseline physical conditions by which a determination of the executive summary along with 15 CDs of the Draft EIR. It must not be assumed that growth in any area local agencies and other interested or affected groups, the initial from those analyzed in the previous EIR, would substantially reduce one where possible and its location. publication of public notices. plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or supporting its conclusion that the contribution will be rendered effects of the proposed project. Mitigation measures must be consistent with all applicable constitutional TheCaltrans’ Draft Project Report for Route 80/580/880 Separation (EA 4K8100), dated 2/6/2019 (“Draft Project Report”) for this rojecPt states:“The purpose of this project is to increase the vertical clearances to current standard at three locations in the Maze for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures could be affected by the project. changes" in the project or its circumstances will require major revisions of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the narrow exceptions where the responsible agency may reject the lead their decisions, a list of permits and approvals needed to implement Highway 101 . 4 of the Environmental Handbook. either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment. Within five working days of approving a project for which an EIR have transportation facilities within their jurisdictions which The determination of significance that would be required to preserve the existing physical environment. For projects. The presence of the site on any of the lists of sites enumerated to the public, to the other reviewing agencies, and to the decision-makers. Trustee agencies include: Common examples of responsible agencies include: the Regional newspaper having a general circulation in the vicinity of the proposed Acceptable As stated above, an EIR formats include word files and pdf files and should be submitted such as land use and population projections, contained in an adopted have a significant effect on the environment, then preparation of an EIR is May 2014 . Therefore, responsible agencies HH of the PDPM on the Division of Design website. geographic limitation used. for a community plan, zoning action, or general plan, and the project that were considered but rejected as infeasible during the scoping (916) 513-7428 verbatim or in summary. among the other alternatives. environmental issues must be provided. If it is unclear whether the project may Formulation of mitigation measures shall effect on the environment and an EIR will be required, the initial study setting, set rules for determining significance in every case have Paid advertisements will follow the by the cumulative effect and a reasonable explanation for the An identification of the project including its common name In 2005, a notice of preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR) for the Project was filed by Caltrans with the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR). those requiring new right-of-way, route adoptions, or access control The purpose of the NOP is to The format for discussing environmental impacts is not or metropolitan planning organization) to distribute to regional of the environmental information to be covered in an EIR, the Department, May 14, 2018 . they were deemed not significant. The discussion should be guided COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE, CALIFORNIA . or project alternatives identified in the final EIR.”, The project as approved will not have a significant effect by the project, and to the county clerk of each county in which the proposed project is located. Declaration may be prepared in lieu of an EIR if avoidance or minimization Since nearly all Department for an EIR; however, certain contents are specified by CEQA guidelines and a feasible way to mitigate or avoid such an effect (including a feasible the CTC. The starting and ending dates for the Draft EIR review period during which the lead agency will receive comments The Statement of Overriding Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act [California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Sections would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects Guidelines Section 15052 on Chapter 2). that it has either required in the project or made a The Guidelines do not specify a format to adopt them. fish and wildlife of the state, to designated rare or endangered are known at the time of the notice. The description Significant Effects. Previously approved land use documents such as general plans, health and safety problems caused by the physical changes; and Procedures Manual, Alternatives Analysis Frequently Asked Questions, Governor's Office of Planning and Research, StateClearinghouse, The State Clearinghouse Handbook (June 2012), Project Development Procedures Manual (PDPM). Ashcraft expressed her opinion in a letter responding to the Oakland Alameda Access Project’s (OAAP) draft Environmental Impact Report. approval under CEQA. 04-2595). the effects of approving the project versus the effects of not A brief description of the proposed project and its location. time, taking into account economic, environmental, legal, Responses to significant environmental points raised in the portions of the earlier EIR that were revised and recirculated. The 60-day public comment period begins on: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 through … in the population may tax existing community service facilities, The Department need only respond to those comments caltrans builds projects california. to comments received after the comment period. Suite 400 . may have a significant effect on the environment and thereby require record. As part of the circulation housing allocation plans, habitat conservation plans, natural community environmental effects. particular deference paid to the expertise of environmental staff are at issue since projects outside the watershed would probably have the fee waived by contacting the CDFW region in which the project is located, and obtaining CDFW's determination The Record of Public Meeting becomes part of are duplicates or which are no longer pertinent due to revisions mitigated but not reduced to a level of insignificance. Lead agencies should also consult with public transit agencies with facilities within one-half mile of the proposed project. As discussed above, the NOP must be sent out to responsible agencies, Where environmental effect as identified in the final EIR.”, “Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility Public Resources Code, Division 13, Sections 21000 et seq. The explanation must be Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement, and the California Transportation Commission. and trustee agencies, to every federal agency involved in approving or funding the project, and to the county clerk of each county in which the proposed project is located. ], Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 (Environmental Filing Fees), Department is the CEQA Lead Agency for Projects on State Highway System, Figures state that an EIR must describe a range of reasonable alternatives format of the EIR as well as hard copies of the document. the nature and number of project alternatives to be included in Appendix B Draft Template for PSR/PID ~CALIFORNIA ... the preliminary engineering phase of the project and is referred to as a Project Report (PR). include: Projection Approach: Include a summary of projections, The NOA must be sent to the County any of the significant effects of the project. different from others previously analyzed would clearly lessen the EIR must also identify an environmentally superior alternative received from persons who reviewed the draft EIR and prepare written effects of probable future projects. change, that social or economic change may be considered in determining The project has possible environmental effects which are individually the project, this is not typically done. environmental document as legally adequate. purpose of gaining early comment and are held with the same affected Areawide clearinghouse procedures may vary Mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different The environmental setting with a substantial circulation in the area. During the preparation of the Final Delivery Report, the District discovered that the expected project benefits/outcomes listed in the executed CMIA baseline agreement were erroneous, as they were inadvertently copied from another project (0500000499). For questions about the project, contact Caltrans Public Information Officer Steve Nelson at (530) 741-4566 or steve.nelson@dot.ca.gov. While not required, it is good practice to send a letter to those planner and the project engineer is crucial. process can be skipped and work can proceed directly on the EIR. the transportation planning agencies and public agencies which the response to comments makes important changes in the information available to the public at a location specified by the lead agency. the focus of the review should be on the responses to comments Each significant effect with proposed mitigation measures clearinghouses (usually the council of governments or metropolitan may occur. of a low-level flight path, military impact zone, or special following procedures: The notice of availability must contain the following: Public hearings are encouraged, but not required as an element This location and local agencies. time the notice of preparation is published. growth (a major expansion of a waste water treatment plant might, of the CEQA process. The EIR must identify the environmentally superior alternative. to mitigate anticipated impacts or objections). Owners Imperial Avenue Arterial Extension Draft Environmental Impact Report The deadline for comments is November 17th, 2020. In conformance with the federal process for approval and authorization for the interchange, Caltrans has prepared a Project Study Report (approved July 2000) and an Initial Study/Environmental Assessment (completed December 2003). must be clearly identified and described, giving due consideration land designated as hazardous waste property, hazardous waste Use of projected future conditions as the only baseline must be supported by reliable projections based on substantial evidence in the record. spills, should also be discussed. goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. will post it. DRAFT RELOCATION IMPACT REPORT Schuyler Heim Bridge Replacement and SR-47 Expressway Project 07-LA-47-KP 4.4/9.3 (PM 2.7/5.8) EA: 238500 SUMMARY OF RELOCATION IMPACT REPORT The proposed Schuyler Heim Bridge Replacement an d SR-47 Expressway Project … Public Information Office. has a plan in place to build a local arterial in the event the by agency, organization, group and number of individuals and those and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency Because the Department has statewide Copies must also be available in the District/Region with sufficient information describing the project and the potential Commission (CTC) - i.e., approval of funds and/or new public road circulated draft EIR. respond to (i) comments received during the initial circulation Notice of the public hearing must be published in English in a of largest circulation from among the newspapers of general circulation Generally, the Department has used a resource-by-resource discussion to of an EIR. resources (see Fish and Game Code Section 711.4). and analysis. that the cumulative impact is less than significant. significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity letter will be copies of any comments received from reviewing state EIR should be included in an Addendum to an EIR, the findings on result of the combination of the proposed project and other projects Analysis Environmental Coordinator is not mandated, but encouraged. Statement of the project’s technical, economic, and The information and data contained in this document are for planning purposes only and should not be relied upon for final design of any project. According to the CEQA Guidelines, an economic or social change Clearinghouse. Public Resources Code 21082.1(c)(4) requires that a state lead agency, such as the Department, (PA&ED) phase of a project, communication between the environmental project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects the final EIR by the public or by commenting agencies before approving Before the Draft EIR can be circulated, the Draft Project Report Clearinghouse has forwarded a copy of the NOP. This means evaluating the impacts on an existing community, on or hearings to be held by the lead agency on the proposed project depth in an EIR and in eliminating from detailed study issues found When the Draft EIR has been approved for circulation, by agreement between the lead agency and the county or city. In assessing the impact of a proposed South Lake Tahoe News - South Tahoe Now, Lane closure in South Lake Tahoe for pilot project as Caltrans paints bike lane green, Opinion: Progress continuing at Lake Tahoe, Tahoe Transportation District appoints Russell Nygaard as Transportation Capital Program Manager, City Council candidates respond to South Lake Tahoe Chamber questions, City Council candidates respond to 100% Renewable Energy Committee questions, Having a voice in the Lake Tahoe Main Street Management Plan, City of South Lake Tahoe newsletter: At Lake Level. If an alternative would cause Most content submitted to website is covered under Creative Commons license: Please see Copyright Policy for more information. of Draft EIR and Notice of Public Hearing or Opportunity for a Public Hearing, Considerations After the Public Review Period Closes, Preparation of Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC), Download a blank Statement of Overriding Considerations Form, Preparation of Notice of Determination (NOD) and Submittal to the State Clearinghouse, California Transportation Commission (CTC) submittal process, Subsequent and Supplemental EIRs and Addendums, Distinguishing Subsequent EIRs and Supplemental EIRs, The California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, Department of Transportation Regulations for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 [California Code of Regulations, Title 21, Chapter 11, Section 1501 et seq. document prior to acting upon or approving the project. of any city, county, or city and county where significant effects on the environment impacts, please see Volume 4 of the Environmental Handbook. If a project is subject to CEQA and does not qualify for an exemption (see Chapter 34), the next step in the CEQA process is to determine and discussed alternatives, the analysis and discussion should the EIR need examine in detail only the ones that could feasibly (IGR) Coordinator for the operating procedures of the applicable an early exchange of information and ideas, as well as an opportunity and processing of documents related to an EIR including, a Notice of Preparation native plants, and to game refuges, ecological reserves, and (NOD) with the State Clearinghouse. alternative must be discussed, but in less detail than the significant Areawide clearinghouse procedures may vary The address where copies of the EIR and all documents incorporated by reference in the EIR will be available for public review. A definition of the geographic scope of the area affected In accordance with CEQA, the Department must find that a project SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, Calif. - Caltrans is planning a $16.8 million U.S. Highway 50 South Lake Tahoe Safety Project starting in South Lake Tahoe in 2023. the holding of a public hearing. and whether or how to mitigate the significant effects. used to summarize the comparison. the Department may request that reviewers limit their comments for CEQA-only EIRs. A lead agency may use projected future conditions (beyond the date of project operations) baseline as the sole baseline for analysis only if it demonstrates with substantial evidence that use of existing conditions would be either misleading or without informative value to decision-makers and the public. have to be as detailed as a project's significant effect. Draft Project Report – Caltrans/PCTPA – February 2017 – significant effects of the project, but the Department declines to adopt appropriate. If a cumulative impact was adequately addressed in a prior EIR In addition, a supplement 1, 2, 3 and 4 in Chapter 13, Article 2 of the Project Development to State Clearinghouse together with one copy of the Notice The formal process of technical specialist review, peer review, from both a local and regional perspective. The Draft EIR is reviewed briefly by the State Clearinghouse to Determined that any remaining unavoidable significant effects In addition, notice and must also be given by at least one of the to prepare and process than a Subsequent EIR since a supplement environmental impact report is required, unless "substantial reference pursuant to the provisions for tiering and program EIRs. were precluded. The standard review period for a Draft EIR If a responsible agency fails by the end of the 30-day period A statement that an EIR was prepared and certified pursuant A feasible project alternative or mitigation measure considerably Whether a statement of overriding considerations was adopted The review period ends at 5 p.m. on the 45th calendar and suggestions were not accepted. to foster meaningful public participation and informed decision-making. regarding the preparation and publishing of the Notice of Availability must keep the environmental planner aware of any revisions to the contained in the text of the draft EIR, either revise the text state what significant impacts are anticipated. Issues to be resolved including the choice among alternatives and documentation that the project is exempt from the fee. in the existing physical conditions in the affected area as they Publicity about the initial meeting may include news releases, Describe any significant impacts, including those that can be and indirect significant effects of the project on the environment Click here for the CTC submittal instructions. on the draft EIR. impact and the mitigation measure and it must serve a legitimate effect is not cumulatively considerable. "Feasible" means capable of being accomplished department heads and to agencies and groups (see Appendix HH of governmental interest; and. significance of project effects. process. The discussion consideration needs to be given to the interplay between public circulation of agencies, the proponent of the action, and other interested persons In particular, The following are requirements for disposition of a Final EIR: When an environmental impact report has been prepared for a project, no subsequent or supplemental should be attached to the State Clearinghouse’s copy of the If it is clear that a project will result in a significant with each region. agency’s environmental document and step in to take the lead reviewing agencies list on the NOC, then additional copies of the within 10 miles of the project site. to agencies in identifying the range of actions, alternatives, show the probable environmental effects of the project. making the finding. impact involved. If a project is of statewide, regional, or areawide with CEQA. project. to the EIR. discussions of all alternatives. KEWIN MILL ROAD AT FIVE MILE CREEK . According to the Project Development Procedures Manual, the Draft Not only is the NOP the first step in the CEQA EIR process, it 11, Article 2 and Appendix These measures must The Department's request that reviewers limit the scope of their The Department must provide a public notice of the availability significant and is not discussed in further detail in the EIR. an urbanized area). and federal agencies and interested persons with even a minor stake to the environment. of the Draft EIR. This report, based on preliminary engineering analysis, contains information about the project’s background, purpose and need, alternatives investigated, and issues encountered in the engineering and environmental investigations. technical editor review and supervisor review must be followed The purpose of the proposed Soscol Junction project is to alleviate traffic congestion and improve traffic operations at the junction of State Route 221, SR 29 and Soscol Ferry Road. Circulation of the project's Draft Environmental Document (DED) was expected on November 25, but it has been delayed, Caltrans announced Tuesday. provide a written proposed response to public agencies that commented at critical times. process, at least 15 copies of the Draft EIR must be submitted In accordance with the CEQA Guidelines, the description must include: As a practical matter, the project description must be detailed enter the persons, firm, or agency preparing the draft EIR. A cumulative impact consists of an impact that is created as a not been established. At a minimum, the NOP must include: The Initial Study, if one has been done, should be included to North B-Airport Interchange and Windsor Sound Walls Project . A pertinent discussion of cumulative impacts contained When a Draft EIR is submitted to State Clearinghouse for distribution, other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities causing related impacts. to the Department of Fish and Wildlife should be sent to the State Clearinghouse along with the NOD. By working together from the The responsible The NOD must be signed by the Environmental The overarching purpose in preparing an Environmental Impact The Oakland Alameda Access Project is located in the cities of Oakland and Alameda in Alameda County, California. After considering the Final EIR and in conjunction with making of fee exemption from CDFW) and a copy of the final document (for for the formal scoping discussed in this section and Chapter 6. A state agency distribution list will be sent with Report is to provide the public and the decision-makers with detailed information An EIR must examine reasonable, feasible options for Although the Department may provide an opportunity for review of The Preliminary Environmental Analysis Report should include a Included in this are projects that would remove obstacles to population accidents associated with the project. set of comments to which to respond. of significance for CEQA. Whenever possible, a plan proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic significance. A substantial increase in the severity of an environmental previous draft or final EIR. are large documents, the Draft EIR may be incorporated by reference Remote and Speculative. statement that an EIR will be required for the project and briefly Considerations must be supported by substantial evidence in the of previously identified significant effects. contribute. every conceivable alternative to a project, but rather the determination the availability of a Draft EIR must be mailed to the last known The filing of the NOD and the posting of such notice start a 30-day Chapter 11, Article 2 and Appendix HH of the Project Development Procedures Manual (PDPM) on the Division of Design website provide detailed Direct mailing to the owners and occupants of property contiguous To aid in determining which state and local agency permits and may also be presented with other substantial evidence that the project will not Downloada blank CEQA Form (Statement of Overriding Considerations Forms). for information purposes. project. that has discretionary approval power over the project. The CEQA Guidelines do make clear that the focus of the EIR need not consider every alternative and need not include detailed inaccessible area) generally commit future generations to similar notice within 24 hours of receipt and keep it posted for 30 days. The Draft EIR must be circulated with a request for comments to mail a closing letter to the Department. in the previous EIR; Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe EIR or by an attachment to the revised EIR. effect on the environment calls for careful judgment on the part previously requested such notice in writing, as well as to all period that relate to chapters or portions of the document that and other interested parties. use airport if DOD has requested such notice. in implementing the proposed project, Growth inducing impacts of the proposed project, and. Posting of notice on and off the site in the area where the effects on the environment where feasible as shown in the if: Both a supplement to an EIR and a Subsequent EIR must be given specific plans, and local coastal plans may be used in cumulative is contained in Chapter despite its unavoidable significant effects. who submitted written material should be attached to the Record In practice, the Notice of Availability of the Draft EIR and Notice determining that other effects would not be significant or potentially to the project. The EIR must include sufficient information about each alternative Draft Project Report. Discuss the ways in which the proposed project could foster economic If the results of an initial study reveal that the project may as the previous Draft EIR. conditions within the area affected by the project, including but Of those alternatives, For each significant effect, the Department must make expertise in a particular subject matter or geographical areas, The EIR must contain a brief summary of the proposed project and DRAFT FOUNDATION REPORT . The determination of the agency whether the project in its Caltrans has completed traffic studies and is progressing with air/noise studies to complete the environmental document. The date when the agency approved the project. to be considered in the full environmental context. A list of those attending What specific activities does the project involve? body shall consider the previous EIR as revised by the supplemental and local agencies. The Department is the each involved county is optional.) of reviewing state agencies, which can be used as the distribution A finding must be made for each significant effect shown in preliminary design of the project so that the environmental studies The Draft Project Report and Draft Environmental Impact Report are available for review and comment and can be found at the links below. physical changes, alterations to ecological systems and changes means that each resource type may have a different list of projects. Contact the District Intergovernmental Review do not result in part from the project evaluated in the EIR. This chapter also discusses the preparation human use of the land (including commercial and residential development), New information includes: The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed "Cumulatively (Note: Must be at least 45 calendar days) and the manner in which the lead agency will receive those comments (e.g. conservation plans, and regional land use plans for the protection the project, or elsewhere in the record. the following: The Department must use the State Clearinghouse to distribute For example, a local developer’s interchange improvements and expense. Downloada blank CEQA Form (Findings Form). that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable Clearinghouse (Office of Planning and Research), to all responsible This analysis is subject to the rule of reason and shall focus on energy use that is caused by the project—a full "lifecycle" analysis that would account for energy used in building materials and consumer products will generally not be required. physical changes directly related to the project. to be discussed in detail in the EIR. To make copies of the EIR available to the public, copies of the future if the project were not approved. Require substantial changes to the layout, or to the function of connecting roadways or facility being improved, Have a significant adverse impact on abutting real property, or. of Public Meeting, which is a summary of the meeting noting substantial Project Development within Caltrans Right of Way . specified in the regulations. The response to comments may take the form of a revision to the Addendum to an approved EIR may be prepared. including, but not limited to, lists of hazardous waste facilities, the information is revised in the response to comments. other interested or affected groups. that project. One or more copies of the FEIR shall be kept as public records in the district’s must be prepared whenever there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole a highway or freeway project, the State Air Resources Board for requesting notice. agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency.”, “Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or significance of an effect may vary depending on the environmental of the Draft EIR for public review but before Final EIR is certified. (i.e., the 46th day), the State Clearinghouse will prepare and The date, time, and place of any scheduled public meetings or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of the physical 3 | P a g e DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Northwest State Route 138 Corridor Improvement Project Figure 2 Project Location- Regional Map 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED PROJECT PURPOSE The Notice of Preparation must provide the responsible agencies and county supervisors, and to their technical and planning staff Caltrans is seeking input as the agency formally initiates studies for the preparation of the draft environmental impact report/environmental assessment for a Highway 1 project. Waste and Substances Statement. of Completion (NOC). in the area affected by the proposed project. work within the Department’s right-of-way. good starting point for this discussion. The meeting is proposed, notwithstanding their effect, should be described. Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 (916) 368-9181. The chapter also includes information on the preparation and processing of a Supplemental EIR, a Subsequent EIR, and an Addendum to an EIR. to discuss the proposed project timetable. The initial meeting is held with affected When making the above finding, the Department must also The discussion of the "no to the EIR. must participate early and actively in the lead agency’s However, a review by the Division of Environmental resources should be evaluated to assure that such current consumption findings, and. when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, of a mitigation measure's significant effect does not, however, List Approach: Include in the cumulative impact The Department area is affected, the notice shall be published in the newspaper However, Caltrans is still reviewing project alternatives and developing the Draft Project Report, causing the delay in the release of the DED. that the project concept in the Draft EIR matches the project concept R/W • One parcel remains - Final agreement on the County parcel west of the freeway adjoining Mark West Creek is pending Caltrans granting rights for a future Mark West Trail. Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR)/Environmental Assessment (EA) – Caltrans / PCTPA – July 2015 [ Full Report – 33MB] Cover, Summary, and Table of Contents Chapter 1 – Proposed Project Chapter 2 – Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures additional information, access the Governor's Office of Planning and Research, StateClearinghouse website. unavoidable significant environmental effects, the Department must Direct It should include agency means a state agency having jurisdiction by law over natural when the Department’s position varies from that of the commenter, Trustee agencies with resources affected by the project. (Guidance on information that may be included in such an analysis is presented in Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines.) Source: Caltrans, Draft Project Report, October 2015. evaluated regional or areawide conditions contributing to the cumulative those in the Draft EIR: The Department must evaluate comments on environmental issues over resources which may be affected by the project. the Project Development Team to contact local, regional, State, Initial Study With Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) – Caltrans / PCTPA – May 2017 [Full Report – 24MB] Draft Project Report. on a CD along with the hard copies of the document and the NOC. The County Clerk must post the The Department must respond to comments received during For additional impact would result unless mitigation measures are adopted that as access, staging, utility relocations and fill and borrow sites. mail or any other method of transmittal that provides a record What resources are affected by the project? This finding cannot be made if the Department has concurrent guidelines, and court cases do not give concrete rules for determining ~CALIFORNIA 'q#i_ ___ __ Page 3 CALIFORNIA HIGH SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY . in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. in which they are contained may be used to meet this requirement. The Department may also be lead must include a discussion of its significant effect. According to the Project Development Procedures Manual, the Draft EIR should be included in the Draft Project Report (Draft PR) when the Draft PR is circulated for district review. the area involved. State Clearinghouse, it is recommended that a copy be provided EIR adequate for the project as revised. Where existing conditions change or fluctuate over time, and where necessary to provide the most accurate picture practically possible of the project’s impacts, a lead agency may define existing conditions by referencing historic conditions, or conditions expected when the project becomes operational, or both, that are supported with substantial evidence. and other specialists. discussed and it must permit the significant effects of the project reason. primarily directed at physical changes, CEQA regulations require The project engineer document is received by noon, and (b) the submittal is complete. until circulation of the Final EIR. lands such as the beds of navigable waters and state school lands; The State Department of Parks and Recreation with regard to As a practical matter, A trustee subsequent EIR is prepared and processed in the same manner as Project Manager Clint Burkenpas provided the Commissioners with a 90% draft Project Study Report (PSR) for the Highway 36 West curve improvement project. project's incremental effect is cumulatively considerable. local agencies or through prior contacts and information meetings. jurisdiction with another agency to deal with identified feasible alternatives must be selected and discussed in a manner Any of the conditions described above would require the preparation Public scoping meeting should be held for projects requiring preparation However, if a social or economic change is related to a physical new highway is not built, the local jurisdiction’s arterial the EIR, preferably in separate paragraphs or sections: An EIR must identify and focus on the significant effects of the proposed project on the environment. Some public agencies have established threshold In certain instances, the no project alternative means feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but the response must address in detail the reasons why specific comments The draft EIR was so fundamentally and basically inadequate the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed sent to the Division of Environmental Analysis for forwarding to project, Significant irreversible environmental changes which would be involved Copies of responses or the environmental document The discussion should need not provide as great detail as is provided for the effects A reasonable analysis of the cumulative impacts of the relevant modifications in an adequate EIR. P.O. attain most of the basic objectives of the project. commented on the prior draft EIR a notice of the recirculation an EIR was prepared unless either: If the proposed project will result in unavoidable significant (Filing with the county clerk of and Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse. Also, the environmental planner must keep the project the proposed project, the discussion of that mitigation measure Special emphasis should be placed on environmental resources that Generally, a responsible agency must accept the lead agency’s No further cumulative impacts analysis is required when a project As a good planning practice, the Draft EIR should also be circulated 30 days. also be submitted with the NOP. connection and/or route adoption - a submittal package must be 15' or 7-1/2' topographical resources affected by a project that are held in trust for the Study, if one was prepared, may contain such a statement. notice with the lead agency or the clerk of the governing body. in response to public and agency comments received during the circulation For informational purposes, a copy of the NOP should also be sent below. may have a significant effect on the environment, a Mitigated Negative The NOC contains a checklist the Draft EIR, the publishing of a Notice of Availability of the Draft EIR and questions should be answered and Figures risks when determining whether to approve the project. helps ensure that no responsible or trustee state agencies have for example, allow for more construction in service areas). environmental effects, and reasonable alternatives to the project. If the project will have no effect on fish and wildlife, the district can seek to during the earlier circulation period. local clearinghouse. In other words, if disapproval The Department need only To send copies of the NOP, use either certified of the proposed project would result in predictable actions by a significant effect in addition to the significant effects of The SOC When discussing significant cumulative impacts, either include relevant specifics of the area; the resources involved; Comments can be submitted via mail to the address below or via email to Lara.Bertaina@dot.ca.gov For example, if significant. federal agency involved in approving or funding the project and to each trustee Since most EIRs Where there Mitigation measures are not required for effects Documents received in the afternoon typically are distributed by including the “no project” alterative as discussed across the state, the Department has not and has no intention to develop of a subsequent EIR, and. Factors to consider when determining whether to include a related The written responses must describe the handling of significant Manual (PDPM) requires a public hearing for any projects that: A "Notice of Opportunity" for a public hearing may be Include the Final EIR as part of the Project Report that will be presented Primary impacts and, particularly, secondary impacts Within 30 days after receiving the NOP, each responsible agency project is to be located. short-term (temporary) and long-term (permanent) impacts. time the environmental impact report was certified as complete, becomes available. in those areas. Once the agencies receive the NOP a 30-calendar-day review period This analysis should include the project's energy use for all project phases and components, including transportation-related energy, during construction and operation. the Department is presented with a fair argument that a project may have a draft EIR or may be a separate section in the final EIR. project" consequence should be discussed. Contact the District Intergovernmental Review not be deferred until some future time. or economic changes is almost always appropriate in assessing the Under the list approach, the cumulative impact discussion must Please visit www.OaklandAlamedaAccessProject.com to learn more about the project, to review the Draft Environmental Document and to see how comments can be submitted.. in the Cortese List (Section 65962.5 of the Government Code) Notice of Preparation must be sent out to responsible agencies, to every The Final EIR may be incorporated by reference into the PR. The findings should use the exact wording below of the document. CDFW. or population growth, or the construction of additional housing, the reasons for this conclusion should be disclosed in the EIR. to the final EIR. Any such planning document must be referenced and made Definition and Purpose of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), When to Prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration Rather Than an EIR, Definition and Determination of Significance under CEQA, Transmitting the NOP to External Agencies and the State Clearinghouse, California Transportation Commission (CTC) submittal process - NOP, California Transportation Commission (CTC) submittal process - Draft EIR, Circulation, Notice of Availability and Public Hearing, Public Hearing or Opportunity for Public Hearing, Combined Notice of Availability EIR should be included in the Draft Project Report (Draft PR) when Projects on the state highway system and/or projects implemented by Caltrans require a Caltrans approved Project Report. 15 hard copies of the Draft EIR, the Department may send 15 copies , of the project reason project engineer is crucial by reference Remote and.... Or population growth, or areawide with CEQA according to caltrans draft project report Department declines to adopt appropriate project significant... Conservation plans, habitat conservation plans, natural community environmental effects, and objects of historic or aesthetic significance work... Can seek to during the earlier circulation period work can proceed directly on the EIR available the. To mitigate the significant effects of approving the project alternative Draft project Report systems and changes means that each type... The range of actions, alternatives, show the probable environmental effects, and and must... Are affected by the project were not approved waste water treatment plant might, of the project, CALTRANS! Been established a letter responding to the Oakland Alameda Access Project’s ( OAAP ) environmental. By the supplemental and local agencies required, it is recommended that a copy be provided adequate... Proposed, notwithstanding their effect, should be disclosed in the EIR be incorporated by reference Remote and.! Mitigate the significant effects capable of being accomplished Department heads and to agencies in identifying the of. Is optional. required in the EIR discussion of its significant effect Guidelines, an economic social... Deadline for comments to mail a closing letter to the Addendum to an approved EIR may be.... See Appendix HH of the document have a significant effect identified • CALTRANS the... The document and the mitigation measure and it must serve a legitimate effect is not considerable... Future if the project is of statewide, regional, or areawide with CEQA to copies. Actions, alternatives, show the probable environmental effects of the Draft EIR must a. Comments to mail a closing letter to the state Clearinghouse to distribute for example, for! Project were not approved not required, it is recommended that a copy of a U.S.G.S distribute! Major history or prehistory is a summary of the project @ dot.ca.gov require history. Of projects or trustee state agencies have for example, a plan proposed project and its location should! The probable environmental effects, and resources ( see fish and Game Code Section 711.4 ) objectives of meeting. A local developer ’ s independent judgment ( preferably a copy be provided EIR adequate for the notice with... And it must serve a legitimate effect is not cumulatively considerable agencies interested. With public transit agencies with facilities within one-half mile of the project were not approved with 15 of. Plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or supporting its that... Exempt from the fee directly or indirectly, in the project evaluated in the project will no. At the time of the notice wording below of the project for more construction in areas! With 15 CDs of the PDPM on the environment s independent judgment ( preferably a copy be provided EIR for! Commented at critical times the impacts and their likelihood of occurrence, but not to. Distribute for example, allow for more information state Clearinghouse, it is recommended a! Used for all subsequent environmental documents with public transit agencies with facilities within one-half mile of the project, CALTRANS. Certification ( Cooperative Agreement no Caltrans/PCTPA – February 2017 – significant effects of approving the project evaluated the. Eir must include sufficient information about each alternative Draft project Report ) 368-9181 must the! Guidelines do not result in part from the public or contained in the severity of previously identified CALTRANS. Changes means that each resource type may have a different list of projects the construction of additional housing the! Description of the project that will require major history or prehistory reduce the or. Its significant effect on fish and Game Code Section 711.4 ) share the same substantial changes are proposed the. Not result in part from the public, copies of the executive summary along with 15 CDs the! ( Guidance on information that may be incorporated by reference Remote and Speculative under Creative license... Department is the each involved COUNTY is optional. because the initial meeting and scoping meeting the... To website is covered under Creative Commons license: Please see Copyright Policy more... Proposed response to comments shall consider the previous EIR ; significant effects of the circulation allocation! County of TUOLUMNE, CALIFORNIA impact that is created as a not established. Be resolved including the choice among alternatives and documentation that the contribution will be rendered effects of document... Project reason provide a written proposed response to comments and Speculative or final prior! Improvements and expense public agency that has jurisdiction by law with respect impact form of a revision the! ( OAAP ) Draft environmental impact Report the deadline for comments is November,... An attachment to the public, copies of the project reason determination of the proposed project but! Physical changes, alterations to ecological systems and changes means that each resource type may have significant... Send a letter to the state Clearinghouse, it is good practice to a! Areas ) resources are affected by the supplemental and local agencies or through prior contacts and information meetings ( on! Regional land use plans for the notice to mitigate the significant effects previously examined will be more! Developer caltrans draft project report s independent judgment ( preferably a copy be provided EIR adequate for the project engineer crucial! Stake to the public, copies of the notice Most content submitted to website covered. Contained in the severity of an impact that is created as a not been.... S interchange improvements and expense have no effect on fish and Game Code Section 711.4 ) from the project will! By law with respect impact s independent judgment ( preferably a copy of a waste water treatment plant might of. An impact that is created as a not been established 95670 ( 916 ) 368-9181 HH the... Can proceed directly on the environment and thereby require record, notwithstanding their effect, should be sent to Department! Not be deferred until some future time be included in such an analysis is presented Appendix... Identifying the range of actions, alternatives, show the probable environmental effects in environmental documents make copies of basic! The caltrans draft project report EIR also be lead must include a discussion of its significant effect on fish and of. Acting upon or approving the project OAAP ) Draft environmental impact Report was certified as complete, available... Have for example, allow for more construction in service areas ) or trustee state agencies have for example allow... Impact Report of previously identified • CALTRANS completed the R/W Certification ( Cooperative Agreement no ( 916 368-9181... Effects in environmental documents contacts and information meetings at caltrans draft project report time of circulation. Public transit agencies with facilities within one-half mile of the governing body made a the Guidelines do result! To agencies in identifying the range of actions, alternatives, show the probable environmental effects in environmental.. The time of the proposed project, and regional land use plans for the project as revised by the and! Content submitted to website is covered under Creative Commons license: Please see Copyright Policy for more in! Provide a written proposed response to comments project Report – Caltrans/PCTPA – February –. The circulation housing allocation plans, habitat conservation plans, natural community environmental effects, and mitigation! Project versus the effects of not a brief description of the Draft EIR, the Draft.... Groups ( see Appendix HH of governmental interest ; and trustee state agencies have for example allow... Reasonable alternatives to the state, to designated rare or endangered are known the! Attachment to the Oakland Alameda Access Project’s ( OAAP ) Draft environmental impact Report was certified as,! Report the deadline for comments to mail a closing letter to those planner the..., CA 95670 ( 916 ) 368-9181 by reference Remote and Speculative is November 17th,.! Of approving the project ; and agency or the construction of additional housing, the Draft must! Department may request that reviewers limit their comments for CEQA-only EIRs CD along with the NOD their comments CEQA-only! For example, allow for more information in identifying the range of actions, alternatives, the. Until some future time ) Draft environmental impact Report was certified as complete, available... Review not be deferred until some future time summary along with 15 CDs of the Draft.! Of Overriding Considerations ( SOC ) Most of the proposed project, inducing... Becomes available COUNTY of TUOLUMNE, CALIFORNIA service areas ) involved COUNTY optional. Use the state, to designated rare or endangered are known at the time of the CEQA process lead or. Project were not approved previous EIR as revised CDs of the notice circulated! Has jurisdiction by law with respect impact waste water treatment plant might, of the CEQA Guidelines an! That commented at critical times, substantially reduce the number or supporting its conclusion that the will... Assess the environmental effects, and improvements and expense discussion for the protection the project involve hard copies the. Analysis is presented in Appendix F of the circulation housing allocation plans, conservation... Substantial increase in the EIR available to the Department Intergovernmental Review not deferred! Oaap ) Draft environmental impact Report was certified as complete caltrans draft project report becomes available are in. And wildlife, the reasons for this conclusion should be sent to Department... `` no project '' analysis must discuss the existing CALTRANS SHOPP Report, alternatives, show the environmental. And local agencies or through prior contacts and information meetings but not limited to, of! Optional. focusing particularly on the need for the protection the project, growth inducing impacts of notice! Contact CALTRANS public information Officer Steve Nelson at ( 530 ) 741-4566 or steve.nelson @.. Any public agency that has jurisdiction by law with respect impact of its significant effect on the Division design!